Summer plans

Some of us will be working in Houston, some going abroad, but however this group will disperse, we will continue striving to bring Houston & Texas political news and commentary. At this time, however, we would like to discuss two specific political opportunities undertaken by members of this board.

First, George Bailey, the Bostonian of the Editorial Board (& a native Houstonian) has accepted a summer position in the office of Senator Ted Cruz, in Washington D.C. Accordingly, at this time George will refrain from writing anything on Sen. Cruz, and will abstain from any pertinent editorials on those subjects.

Second, Noah M. Horwitz, who is spending an extended summer in Houston this year, has accepted an offer to work on public relations and marketing issues with the Clifford Group. Some of these issues may be hot-button political topics that otherwise would receive coverage on Texpatriate. Accordingly, Noah will not write on any topics he is consulting on and will abstain from editorials on those topics as well.

Another view of Uber

Uber and Lyft have been creating quite the uproar recently in Houston politics, openly challenging the current regulations for taxis and private cars. It seems that taxi operators are concerned that Uber will undercut their fares and drive them out of business. However, there is also concern with Uber’s “price gouging” by charging more at peak business times. I see no reason for these fears, but I do think it is important that we review how these companies operate to ensure the safety of those who use them.

First of all, I’ve had very good experiences with Uber in other cities. You simply enter your destination in the Uber app; and it tells you exactly how much the fare will be, when your driver will arrive and charges the fare to your credit card upon arrival at your destination. When you reach your destination you say thank you and step out of the car. In my opinion, this system is infinitely better than that of traditional cabs.

Click here to read the full viewpoint!

Election Watch Parties

Texpatriate will be offering comprehensive election night coverage tomorrow evening. Noah M. Horwitz will begin the evening at 5:30 (Houston time), live from Boston, offering color commentary and predictions for the final 90 minutes of Election Day. At the conclusion of voting, he will be joined by George Bailey to begin a full program, where the two will switch off between reading results and analyzing numbers. Texpatriate will be calling races and projecting victories in certain races before all votes will be counted.

Bailey & Horwitz will be joined in intermittent commentary throughout the proceedings by Andrew Scott Romo in New Orleans and Olivia Arena in Austin. Additionally, Texpatriate‘s Staff Writer Sophia Arena will be livestreaming from Annise Parker’s watch party in Downtown Houston.

We will provide a link to this livestream coverage on our website. Starting tomorrow afternoon, the first link on should be an embedded video. Pre-coverage starts at 5:30, full program begins at 7:00 and the full program will end no later than 11:00. If there are any races still undecided at that time, Horwitz will stay on air as long as they are counting votes.

Click here to read about Candidates’ watch parties!

Undervaluing Public Service

As Noah M. Horwitz already reported a few days ago, Governor Rick Perry tapped Associate Justice Nathan Hecht as his pick for Wallace Jefferson’s replacement as Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court.  Hecht will serve until the next election, at which point he intends to run for a full term.  Chief Justice Jefferson has indicated that he will not run for another elected office, but will rather seek employment in the private sector.

Jefferson pushed hard during his term for an increase in judges’ salaries, an argument met with a moderate amount of approval with lawmakers increasing judicial salaries by 12% this year.  While these salary increases are a great improvement, the low salaries of judges serve as a highly visible indication of how little our society values the vital work our judges perform – much like the pitifully low salaries of teachers.  A judge can make significantly more in the private sector, a factor Jefferson himself said influenced his decision to resign.

It is a sad state of affairs to see that we, as a society, generally do not value public servants.  Teachers, judges, firemen, police officers and other public servants are frequently forced to choose between taking a lower paying job that makes our society a better, safer place and making a living for themselves in the private sector.  Although these individuals still receive some compensation for their invaluable service, it is a shame that they are still underpaid for their service to society.

Brazilians, Christie and medicine

On Thursday August 22nd, a few representatives of the Editorial Board met with a Brazilian delegation of youth leaders, and other officials representing the City of Houston, in an effort to share information about youth civic activism.  Olivia Arena, Noah M. Horwitz and I were asked to join in the meeting to give our perspective on the Mayor’s Youth Council –the organization we all met each other serving on– from the position of alumni.  Councilmember Jack Christie presided over the meeting and provided the Brazilian delegates pertinent background about Houston and its importance globally.  He was chosen for this important position because of his recent trip with Mayor Annise Parker to South America, where they participated in a cultural exchange.

Councilmember Christie dominated the conversation for the first twenty minutes or so, explaining Houston’s prominent place in the oil industry and giving a brief overview of its history.  He also took it upon himself to give a brief history of South America and the importance of oil there.  While Christie made an important connection pointing out our similar interests in the energy economy, it seemed rather strange to be telling people from Brazil about their homeland.

Each member of the Brazilian delegation then introduced themselves, followed by a short comment from Councilmember Christie.  The first delegation member explained his involvement with providing health services to members of his community and encouraging youth to maintain a healthy lifestyle.  At that point, Councilmember Christie launched into an extended rant on his abhorrence towards modern medicine, stating that this country is “over-medicated” and explaining that he tells his children not to even take aspirin because it’s only a gateway drug to other medications.  He proceeded to repeatedly bring up his revulsion towards modern medicine, making it apparent that he actually does not believe in proven medical treatments of legitimate diseases.  After the Brazilian delegation finished introducing themselves, Councilmember Christie was called into another meeting and he politely excused himself after we took some group photos.

We finished up the meeting by each of us explaining what the Mayor’s Youth Council meant to us and what the Council does on a monthly basis, after which we opened up the meeting to a much more open discussion.  Unfortunately, there wasn’t a lot of time after the extended introductions to truly delve into the open discussion, but I feel we did convey much of the feel of the Mayor’s Youth Council in this brief hour and a half meeting.

What perplexed me long after I left that meeting, however, was why a public official such as Jack Christie would go out of his way to bash the virtues of modern medicine. Given that this is not Coucnilmember Christie’s first experience with the controversial position, I would have expected better from him. However, these comments are systemic of a troubling trend: a rejection of science. Such a position is dangerous.

An expanded curfew is unwise

Like so many ordinances, the county’s curfew regulations have reached their three year expiration date.  The county must now revisit the specifics of the ordinance, and reinstate it.  The Houston Chronicle reports Sheriff Adrian Garcia has proposed a daytime curfew in addition to the nighttime one already in place.  While this would not affect incorporated City of Houston areas, which already have a daytime curfew, this would add more curfew hours to those under the age of 17 in unincorporated Harris County.

Sheriff Garcia believes that such a curfew would give his officers the ability to decrease daytime burglaries since juveniles are sometimes involved in daytime crime.  It would be a means for police officers to “intervene when they think the law applies,” thereby stopping crimes before they happen.

There is strong opposition to the new curfew hours by home-schooled students and their families, who fear they will be unduly affected by the new law, but there are exemptions for home-school students, as well as any student with reasonable cause for being out.  No, there are greater reasons why the curfew should not be expanded aside from the potential for a few home-school students getting tickets.

There is no reason why the crimes committed by juveniles during the day should not be addressed by the laws currently in place.  Furthermore, there is a significant difference between a nighttime curfew and a daytime curfew.  While there are few justifiable reasons a juvenile would be out at 3am, there are countless reasons a teenager would be out at noon during a normal weekday.  Those young adults who are legitimately out of school during normal school hours should not be hindered by a police officer questioning where they are going and what they are doing just because they look to be a certain age.

Sheriff Garcia is essentially asking for a blank check for his officers to stop juveniles and give them citations as they please during school hours, just for being under the age of 17.  While it’s easy for an adult to say yes to such a sweeping gesture, it is important to note that it hinders on the rights of responsible teenagers and could potentially encourage age profiling.  Besides, there do not appear to be significant statistics backing the claim that such a curfew would even significantly decrease daytime crime in unincorporated Harris County.  Nonetheless, early reports indicate that it is likely the ordinance will be reinstated unchanged as many members of the Review Board have indicated a preference to keep the policy as is.

Back in 2009, when I worked at City Hall, I debated this very issue among my contemporaries (including Andrew, Noah & Olivia). At that point we were only discussing the City of Houston curfew, not unincorporated Harris County, but the point remains the same. We ultimately came to the conclusion that the curfews, especially those during the day, did more harm than good.

Four Years Later

Four years ago today, August 18th, 2009, marked the beginning of my political life. At that time, I had been following both national & local politics for some time already, but this was the point that I put myself out to the public and joined the conversation. Simply put, this is the most important decision I have made thus far in my young life.

At some point in August of 2009, preceding my Sophomore year of High School, I figured out it was somewhat easy to speak before the Houston City Council–just how easy, I still did not know. On August 18th, a Tuesday, I called the City Secretary’s office to schedule a time to speak at public session. I am still surprised how quickly I was called back. Calmly, I put together a 3-minute speech on a topic I wished to bring light onto, and convinced my Father to give me a ride to City Hall (I was 15 at the time).

Near the end of public session, after Mayor White had long since left the building, my name was called by Anna Russell and a 5 foot tall child with a medium-sized Jewfro approached the podium with three pieces of paper and began speaking. I spoke at length about just how wrong it was that schools in Houston were named after prominent Confederates (specifically three High Schools: Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee and John H. Reagan), and the reasons why the names should be changed.

Among my reasons were such gems as that Persons of Color going to these schools is  as offensive as I, a Jewish person, being zoned to go Adolf Eichmann Middle School. And that while it would be illegal and against HISD policy to fly a Confederate Flag at a High School, some of these same schools are named after the representatives of that flag.

Obviously, this is not the City of Houston’s issue, but I had hoped that I could stir up some support from the City Council in preparation of another speech at the HISD Board of Trustees. That second speech did, in fact, occur, in part because of the publicity surrounding my City Council speech. I spoke before the Trustees on September 10th, 2009, which, by coincidence, was the day Terry Grier was inaugurated as the new superintendent.

The astute will remember that Senator Mairo Gallegos, may he rest in peace, had given a speech immediately preceding Grier’s confirmation. Well, my speech was immediately succeeding Grier’s confirmation. At that point, I was swarmed by the press, asked by countless organizations to give interviews and quotes. Ultimately, I did appear on KPRC to discuss the issue.

Unfortunately, the institutions and inertia standing against change prevented any concrete action on the issue. Ever since he held the infamous “Why Ride Bikes While Others Die?” protest at UH in response to the Kent State Shootings, my father has liked to say that the entire City of Houston is coated in molasses that slows down progress to a nauseatingly slow pace.

The most important result of my speech on August 18th four years ago was that I put myself out there and entered the conversation on local politics. For the first time in my life, people I had not personally met could listen to my opinions. Perhaps most importantly, the speech set the stage for my years working at City Hall.

In October of that year, I was selected to serve as the District A Councilmember on the Mayor’s Youth Council, an organization made up of 33 well qualified young people who meet to discuss pertinent issues and submit a report to the City Council. When I showed up for the inauguration ceremony at City Council chambers, I met a young woman named Olivia Arena who identified herself as the District A Senior Aide. To this day, I still think the organizers mixed up the roles for the two of us, but that’s a whole different issue.

Throughout the following year, I became close with her and two other members of the group, George Bailey & Andrew Romo. Between the four of us, we dominated the Executive Committee of the council for three years. Not wanting to leave local politics behind us, we discussed ways to stay up on stuff back home while at College. Hence, Texpatriate was born.

None of this would have ever been possible if I had not given that original speech. I would have continued having pent-up opinions on issues with no outlet to discuss them. This would have probably continued until I would have just lost interest in politics and moved on.

Below I embed the speech I gave at the HISD Trustee meeting; it is probably the better of the two speeches. If you click on the links, you can find both the City Council speech and the KPRC interview as well. Again, I look pretty awful, so don’t judge.

Introducing…the Texpatriate Editorial Board

A few months ago, I (Horwitz) welcomed “an old City Hall buddy of mine,” Andrew Romo, into Texpatriate. Originally, the idea was for him to contribute articles, but this proposal was soon abandoned in favor of a more nuanced role. Rather, he has taken over most social networking and general publicity for this blog.

Accordingly, when the idea arose for two more “City Hall buddies” of mine, Olivia Arena and George Bailey, to join the Texpatriate organization, I ultimately came to the conclusion that writing may not be the best position for them. Primarily, I suppose, because most people seem to have better things to do with their lives than constantly read and write about local politics.

The four of us, however, do still want to be closely connected and affiliated with Texpatriate. The conclusion we ultimately came to was to create the Texpatriate Editorial Board (pictured below; from right to left, Noah M. Horwitz, Olivia Arena, George Bailey and Andrew Romo):

editorial board

The board will not manage the general affairs of Texpatriate, such as website changes, design decisions or other general matters. Content on individual articles will still be left, without restriction, to the discretion of the individual writer. This means that nearly every article, which is written by me (Horwitz), will be unchanged.

The key role of this board will be Editorial articles. These will include endorsements, annual or biennial rankings of City Councilmembers/State Legislators/Texas Congresspeople and general opinions or positions on contentious issues. While the vast majority of these editorials will probably be authored through my account, these will not be only my opinion and sometimes might not even be mine at all. All editorials will be obviously marked as those articles where “Texpatriate” is the first word of the title (Ex: “Texpatriate endorses Sylvia Garcia“).

Editorial board decisions will only be reached if the decision is unanimous or 3-1. If there exists a 2-2 tie, no decision will be rendered. Individual members of the board, if their opinions are not completely expressed in the editorials, may write their own opinions on the subject or field their own endorsements for candidates not chosen.

Just a little bit of background on where the political tilt exists within this new board. Olivia Arena and I (Horwitz) have traditionally liberal views, Andrew Romo has moderate views and George Bailey’s complete apathy on national political issues makes a political litmus test difficult. Roughly, his views represent significant local emphasis, but are broadly to the right of centre (just slightly).

We look forward to bringing you our first editorial: “Texpatriate’s best and worst legislators of the 83rd session,” sometime before Texas Monthly comes out with theirs.